jump to body text
contents
chairman's foreword
chief ombudsman's report
the complaints we received
what the complaints were about
how we dealt with the complaints
who complained to us
who the complaints were about
other work we have done
the independent assessor's annual report
report and financial statements
organisation chart
the board
our aims and values
pdf version annual review
(82 pages)

photo 1

photo 5

photo 6

the complaints we received
photo 4

front-line enquiries from consumers
number of new cases each year
new cases by type of complaint

at the front-line

Our customer contact division provides our front-line for all consumer enquiries – by phone, letter and email. During the year we handled 614,148 front-line enquiries – a 12% increase on the year before that (following a 19% increase the year previously). This means we are now handling more than 1,500 phone calls and over 1,250 pieces of new correspondence every day from consumers – with questions, concerns and complaints about the way they believe they have been treated by financial firms.

front-line enquiries from consumers
 
2005

285,149 written enquiries

328,999 phone enquiries
614,148 total enquiries

2004

256,446 written enquiries

291,892 phone enquiries
548,338 total enquiries

2003

196,786 written enquiries

265,554 phone enquiries
462,340 total enquiries
year ended 31 March

Where consumers contact us before raising their complaint with the firm, our customer contact division forwards the complaint to the firm and asks it to investigate the matter under its formal complaints procedure. We remind consumers that they can ask us to get involved directly if the firm is not able to resolve their complaint within eight weeks.

Our customer contact division also gives general advice and guidance to consumers with enquiries. At this early stage, we try to nip straightforward problems in the bud, before they become full-blown disputes. For example, where a problem stems from a simple administrative error or misunderstanding between the customer and the firm, it might only take a few phone calls for us to sort things out.

A key part of this complaints-resolution work involves our customer contact division intervening at the earliest stage in mortgage endowment complaints – for example, by providing information and guidance to consumers whose complaints arise from confusion or uncertainty about redress already on offer from the firm. In many of these cases, the consumer is concerned that there is still something wrong, because the amount of compensation offered does not match the estimated shortfall shown on the “re-projection” letter that the firm sent them. We can resolve many of these early complaints by clarifying – from an entirely independent standpoint – the regulatory approach to mortgage endowment compensation, and by explaining how redress has been calculated in these cases to comply with guidance set by the Financial Services Authority (FSA). During the year our customer contact division resolved 12,721 complaints in this way – complaints which would otherwise have become full-blown cases.

An increasing number of consumers are getting the information they want directly from our website, rather than phoning us or writing to us directly. Over 95,000 people visit our website each month (a 25% annual increase – following a similarly-sized increase the year before). Three-quarters of those who logged on during the year were first-time visitors.

Where further work is needed to resolve complaints, our customer contact division acts as the gateway to our specialist casework teams of adjudicators.

new cases referred to our adjudicators

In the year ended 31 March 2005, our customer contact division referred 110,963 new cases to our adjudicators for more detailed dispute-resolution work – a 13% increase on the previous year. This continues the upward trend of recent years.

The increase in new cases during the year resulted mainly from the continued high volumes of mortgage endowment disputes being referred to the ombudsman service.

We received just under 70,000 new cases about mortgage endowment mis-selling – the highest number so far, and a 34% increase on the number of mortgage endowment complaints received in the previous year. This meant that almost two thirds of new cases during the year were mortgage endowment complaints – compared with around a half the previous year (and under a quarter the year before that).

number of new cases each year
 
2005 110,963 new cases
2004 97,901 new cases
2003 62,170 new cases
2002 43,330 new cases
2001 31,347 new cases
2000 25,000 new cases
year ended 31 March

return to top

new cases by type of complaint
 
2005 69,737 mortgage endowment cases (63% of all complaints)
19,251 other investment-related cases (17% of all complaints)
10,491 banking-related cases (9.5% of all complaints)
11,484 insurance-related cases (10.5% of all complaints)
110,963 new cases in total
2004 51,917 mortgage endowment cases (53% of all complaints)
25,157 other investment-related cases (26% of all complaints)
9,798 banking-related cases (10% of all complaints)
11,029 insurance-related cases (11% of all complaints)
97,901 new cases in total
2003 13,570 mortgage endowment cases (22% of all complaints)
23,872 other investment-related cases (38% of all complaints)
15,070 banking-related cases (24% of all complaints)
9,658 insurance-related cases (16% of all complaints)
62,170 new cases in total
2002 14,595 mortgage endowment cases (34% of all complaints)
13,711 other investment-related cases (31% of all complaints)
8,117 banking-related cases (19% of all complaints)
6,907 insurance-related cases (16% of all complaints)
43,330 new cases in total
2001 9,067 mortgage endowment cases (29% of all complaints)
9,568 other investment-related cases (30% of all complaints)
6,153 banking-related cases (20% of all complaints)
6,559 insurance-related cases (21% of all complaints)
31,347 new cases in total
year ended 31 March

return to top

 

 
Produced by the publications team at the Financial Ombudsman Service We hold the copyright to this publication. But you can freely reproduce the text, as long as you quote the source. © Financial Ombudsman Service Limited, June 2005
about us | publications | how to complain | FAQs | news | links | search| HOME