When Linda was having trouble with her washing machine, she found that the cause was a blockage in an underground pipe. But her insurers turned down her claim, so she asked us to investigate if their decision was fair.
Linda’s washing machine wasn’t working. She got in touch with a plumber who found that the waste pipe beneath her garden wasn’t flowing from the washing machine properly. This meant water was backing up. So Linda made a claim.
Her insurer sent a drainage company to her house to survey the waste pipe. They said there was some debris in the pipe, which the drainage company had washed away, so water was flowing again. They said that although there were some minor defects in the pipework, the pipe was still serviceable. So they said this didn’t amount to damage and turned down Linda’s claim.
Linda felt this was unfair and made a complaint. Unhappy with her insurer’s final response, she contacted us and referred her complaint.
What we said
We looked at the drainage report, which showed the pipe had some small cracks and a displaced joint. We also looked at Linda’s policy, which didn’t define accidental damage.
We defined damage as an incident caused by “unforeseen” and “unexpected” events. We didn’t find anything to suggest that Linda could have known the problem was going to happen. It wasn’t clear whether the cracks and displaced joint had allowed the debris to get into the pipe, which then caused the problem. But we were happy that this did amount to damage.
Linda’s policy covered “damage”, so we decided the insurer’s decision was unfair. We told the insurer to repair the damaged section of the pipe, which included replacing the section if needed.
Related case studies
Consumer complains when insurer reduces claim settlement on her home insurance
Consumer says insurer unfairly cancelled policy because of incorrect information