Keva complained to us about the sale of her personal accident policy. She said she had never agreed to take out the policy and it wasn’t the sort of policy she would have purchased.
Keva complained to us about the sale of her personal accident policy. She said she had never agreed to take out the policy and it wasn’t the sort of policy she would have purchased. The business argued that Keva agreed to buy the policy during a phone call in 2006.
How we helped
Because of the amount of time that had passed since the event, there wasn’t a copy of the sales call recording available. We asked the business to give us a copy of the sales script that would have been in use at the time. But the sales script wasn’t dated – so we couldn’t be satisfied it was used back in 2006.
The business’s system notes showed that a policy document was generated around the time the business said the sales call took place. But there wasn’t anything to show this document was actually sent to Keva. And even if we could say the policy document was sent to Keva, this didn’t help us work out whether she consented to the sale of the policy.
As the payments for the insurance were fairly small, Keva thought they were bank charges showing on her statements. We looked at her statements and thought this was plausible.
Overall, because we didn’t have enough evidence to show that Keva agreed to take out the policy or that the business made the terms clear to her at the start, we were satisfied the policy was mis-sold.
Because the policy was sold by the insurer, we asked the insurer to cancel her policy from the start. We also asked them to refund all of Keva’s premiums, and add simple interest to the refund of 8% per year, from the date each premium was paid – until the date of settlement.
Related case studies
Consumer complains about the increase of her premiums in her home insurance policy
Consumer unhappy his insurance claim for his damaged drone wasn’t covered by his policy