We make decisions based on what we think is fair and reasonable, accounting for the unique circumstances of each case we receive. We anonymise our decisions and write them in a way that prevents the person or small business complaining from being identified.
This database holds all the final decisions we’ve published since 1 April 2013 under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, as amended by the Financial Services Act 2012.
Your search returned 70502 results
-
Decision Reference DRN9177325
14 Feb 2014 Lloyds Bank PLC Not upheldBanking and creditMr L complains that Lloyds Bank PLC pursued him for debts he did not owe and registered adverse information on his credit file about these debts. Mr L also complains that Lloyds did not cancel his direct debit as it should have done. He considers that as a result he incurred charges a... (2 pages)View decision -
Decision Reference DRN6845957
16 Jan 2014 NEO Media Solutions Limited UpheldBanking and creditMiss N complains about a debt reduction agreement that she took out with NEO Media Solutions Limited, trading as One Debt Solution. She complains that it did not pay any money to her creditor and that it did not respond to her concerns satisfactorily.backgroundMiss N entered into a deb... (2 pages)View decision -
Decision Reference DRN8396729
19 Jan 2016 Arrow Global Limited UpheldBanking and creditMr T complains that Arrow Global Limited (“Arrow”) continued to demand payment of a debt even though it’s statute barred.backgroundArrow bought Mr T’s store card debt in 2011. Mr T says he hadn’t made any payments towards the debt since the end of 2005 when he fell ... (3 pages)View decision -
Decision Reference DRN-3139556
16 Dec 2021 MBNA Limited Not upheldBanking and PaymentsDRN-3139556 The complaint Mr P complains MBNA Limited (MBNA) failed to notify him of missed payments on his credit card account and have registered a default on his credit file. What happened Mr P says he was contacted by a debt collection agency, informing him they had taken over his cred... (4 pages)View decision -
Decision Reference DRN-5489947
22 Apr 2025 Plend Limited UpheldConsumer CreditDRN-5489947 The complaint Mr C complains that Plend Limited was irresponsible in its lending to him. What happened Mr C was provided with a £10,000 loan by Plend in November 2023. The loan term was 60 months and Mr C was required to make monthly repayments of around £247. Mr C said that... (5 pages)View decision -
Decision Reference DRN4536503
19 Jul 2019 Telefonica UK Limited UpheldBanking and creditMr M complains that Telefonica UK Limited, trading as O2, shouldn’t have lent him money because he couldn’t afford to repay it. His accounts went into arrears, he was disconnected and charged fees. He wants the outstanding balance written off and all negative markers removed from his credi... (4 pages)View decision -
Decision Reference DRN-4106004
22 Jun 2023 QDR Solicitors Limited Not upheldConsumer CreditDRN-4106004 The complaint Mr N complains about the contact from QDR Solicitors Limited regarding debts it’s attempting to collect. What happened Mr N has explained that two payday loans were fraudulently opened in his name in 2016 and 2017. A business I’ll call L went on to purchase the ac... (3 pages)View decision -
Decision Reference DRN-2542163
4 May 2021 Oxford Capital Partners LLP Not upheldInvestmentsDRN-2542163 The complaint Mr E complains that Oxford Capital Partners LLP (“Oxford Capital”) provided misleading information about the Enterprise Investments Scheme (EIS) he invested in. What happened Mr E invested £100,000 in March 2015 in Oxford Capital’s Infrastructure EIS. The EIS was ... (5 pages)View decision -
Decision Reference DRN-1003508
2 Jul 2020 Arrow Global Limited UpheldConsumer CreditThe complaint Miss S has complained that Arrow Global Limited has been pursuing her for a debt which isn’t hers. What happened Miss S is unhappy that Arrow Global is pursuing her for a debt which she thinks might be for a fraudulent loan from 2004. She wants Arrow Global to provide proof o... (2 pages)View decision -
Decision Reference DRN1314385
11 Jul 2018 Lowell Financial Ltd Not upheldBanking and creditMr P complains that Lowell Financial Ltd has not provided him with the information he has requested to prove the debt he paid towards was his.backgroundMr P says that around 2007 his house was repossessed and the bank with which he held a mortgage (the bank) recover... (3 pages)View decision
