Our use of cookies

Necessary cookies

We use necessary cookies to make our site work.

Analytics cookies

We'd also like to set analytics cookies to help us improve our website. Using this tool will set a cookie on your device to remember your preferences.

Read more about how we use cookies on our  cookies policy page

Policy version: 03

fos logo horizontal
Skip to content Open search Jump to navigation
Financial Ombudsman

Use Ctrl + / (or ⌘ + / on OSX) to open the search dialog from any page.

  • News and events
  • Decisions and case studies
    • Back
    • Decisions and case studies – overview
    • Ombudsman decisions
    • Case studies
  • Data and insight
    • Back
    • Data and insight – overview
    • Our insight
    • Quarterly complaints data
    • Half-yearly complaints data
    • Annual complaints data
  • FAQs
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
    • Back
    • Who we are - an overview
    • Our aims and values
      • Back
      • Our aims and values
      • Equality, diversity and inclusion
      • Diversity, inclusion and wellbeing report 2019/20
    • Our customer service
      • Back
      • Our customer service
    • How we make decisions
      • Back
      • How we make decisions
    • Governance and funding
      • Back
      • Governance and funding
      • Alternative Dispute Resolution
      • Annual reports and accounts
      • Board meeting minutes
      • Consultations
      • Strategic plans and budget
    • Our strategy
      • Back
      • Our strategy
    • Our work with other organisations
      • Back
      • Our work with other organisations
    • Meet our staff
      • Back
      • Meet our staff
      • Our board of directors
      • Our executive team
      • Our ombudsmen
    • Join us – careers at the ombudsman service
      • Back
      • Join us – careers at the ombudsman service
      • Join us as an apprentice
      • Join us as an investigator
      • Join us as an ombudsman manager
      • Life at the ombudsman service
      • Application process
  • For consumers
    • Back
    • For consumers – an overview
    • How to complain
      • Back
      • How to complain
    • What to expect
      • Back
      • What to expect
      • Who we can help
      • Time limits
      • How long it takes
      • Compensation
      • Compensation for non-financial loss
      • Compensation for financial loss
      • Tax on compensation
    • Who we’ve helped
      • Back
      • Who we’ve helped
    • Complaints we can help with
      • Back
      • Complaints we can help with
      • PPI
      • Fraud and scams
      • Covid-19 (coronavirus)
      • Banking and payments
      • Borrowing money
      • Insurance
      • Investments
      • Mortgages
      • Pensions and annuities
      • Other complaints
  • For businesses
    • Back
    • For businesses – an overview
    • Resolving a complaint
      • Back
      • Resolving a complaint
      • Before we get involved
      • Leaflet for consumers
      • How we handle complaints
      • Understanding compensation
      • Time limits for businesses
      • Case fees
    • Business support & engagement
      • Back
      • Business support & engagement
      • Technical desk
      • Voluntary jurisdiction
    • Complaints we deal with
      • Back
      • Complaints we deal with
      • PPI
      • Fraud and scams
      • Covid-19 (coronavirus)
      • Banking and payments
      • Insurance
      • Consumer credit
      • Mortgages
      • Investments
      • Pensions & annuities
      • Other complaints
  • Search
For businesses

Coronavirus update

Find out how our service is being impacted by Covid-19 (coronavirus), and what this means for your complaint.

Find out more
  1. Home /
  2. For businesses /
  3. Complaints we deal with /
  4. PPI /
  5. An overview of the ombudsman's approach /

Did the financial business make a recommendation or give advice?

 
Print this page
Share this page
  • Send by email
  • Tweet about this
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook

A financial business giving a recommendation to a consumer will need to be able to show that it took adequate steps to identify and consider the needs of the consumer - and to make a recommendation that was suitable. (Or if it could not make a fully suitable recommendation, at least to point out where its recommendation had some shortcomings.

In many cases this is straightforward to assess. For example, in the case of Mr A (PDF 54KB), the financial business said it was making a personal recommendation. In the case of Mr and Mrs B (PDF 54KB), the financial business specifically recommended the product as suitable for the consumers.

In other cases, it may be clear that no advice or recommendation was given. This might occur, for example, in the context of an internet sale - where the financial business simply sets out the policy for consideration by the consumer without any recommendation.

But in other cases, the position is not so clear cut. Typically, the consumer reports a discussion in which they recall the product being strongly recommended to them. In contrast, the financial business might have documentation that simply talks of drawing the consumer's attention to the option to purchase the PPI policy. Indeed, the financial business may say it never gave advice.

In these cases, we will consider the evidence, and work out what seems most likely to have occurred. Selling might of itself involve some general encouragement. But we are likely to consider as a recommendation any actions which would appear to the consumer to be endorsements of the product in the consumer's own particular circumstances.

Typically, in most PPI sales, the consumer is already engaged in a personal financial discussion with the financial business (about the loan) - and the financial business has access to relevant information about the consumer's circumstances. In most of the cases we see - where PPI is sold in discussion with the consumer (either face to face or over the phone) - the evidence available suggests it will have been on the basis of a recommendation by the financial business.

Sales-process documentation, training manuals and sales scripts can all be helpful evidence in assessing this point. Equally, it might be relevant to assess the degree to which the financial business (or one of its branches) was successful in making sales of PPI to a significant proportion of its consumers in the period. We would also take account of any relevant regulatory findings about past practice.

Obtaining the direct reports of consumers and financial business representatives can also be valuable. But we need to guard against the possibility that recollections of the transaction may be influenced by subsequent events.

The case of Mrs C (PDF 54KB) shows how the ombudsman looks at these issues in the context of an individual complaint.

There is more information about this in the section of our website our approach to payment protection insurance (PPI) mis-sale complaints.

Back to top
Print this page
Share this page
  • Send by email
  • Tweet about this
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook

Call us

Our phone lines are open
8am – 5pm on Monday to Friday.
At times, you might need to wait
to speak to someone.




Get in touch

0800 023 4567

Connect with us

  • Follow us on Facebook
    Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on LinkedIn
    Follow us on LinkedIn
  • Follow us on Youtube
    Follow us on Youtube
  • Follow us on Twitter
    Follow us on Twitter
  • Accessibility
  • Join us: careers
  • Corporate information
  • Legal info
  • Cymraeg
  • Privacy policy
  • Freedom of information
  • Procurement
  • Cookies
  • Data protection and SARs
  • The Modern Slavery Act

©2021 Financial Ombudsman Service